I am using Colibri T30 V1.1E module with Windows CE 7 V1.4 image.
I created a native C++ app to fill a file with 240 MB of data with 1 MB chunks and track the duration in ms.
If I format the card as FAT32, the best time I’ve achieved after multiple tests is 21480 ms.
With TexFAT, the best time I’ve achieved after multiple tests is 99480 ms.
Should I really expect TexFAT to perform 4.6x slower than FAT32?
That seems very slow. I’ve looked at benchmarks between FAT32 and exFAT for desktop PCs and there wasn’t much difference. I didn’t find any benchmarks for TexFAT.